It is currently Wed Jun 18, 2025 12:00 pm

All times are UTC + 1 hour




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Frame 54216: truth or not?
PostPosted: Thu Feb 24, 2011 1:02 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jun 02, 2006 11:06 am
Posts: 789
Location: France
Image

Built in Molsheim, yes or not?
Or number allotted subsequently on an existing frame?

See: http://www.bugattirevue.com/revue13/54.htm


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Frame 54216: truth or not?
PostPosted: Fri Feb 25, 2011 6:20 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2009 8:04 pm
Posts: 4
Yes it's correct, because it has been imported to Switzerland in the 30s and after than the car has been returned to the factory (engine problems)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Frame 54216: truth or not?
PostPosted: Fri Feb 25, 2011 7:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2008 5:07 pm
Posts: 1018
Location: Vienne France
madola wrote:
Yes it's correct, because it has been imported to Switzerland in the 30s and after than the car has been returned to the factory (engine problems)

I dont remember it being returned with engine problems,when i sold it ,it had no engine.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Frame 54216: truth or not?
PostPosted: Fri Feb 25, 2011 8:03 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 1:12 pm
Posts: 2285
madola wrote:
Yes it's correct, because it has been imported to Switzerland in the 30s and after than the car has been returned to the factory (engine problems)


#54206 - Bucar (CH) returned and dismantled


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Frame 54216: truth or not?
PostPosted: Fri Feb 25, 2011 8:41 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 12, 2004 4:26 pm
Posts: 2620
Location: Reeuwijk, The Netherlands
That is 206, not 216.

Was 216 not one of the cars that you assembled, Lazarus?

_________________
Vive la Marque !!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Frame 54216: truth or not?
PostPosted: Fri Feb 25, 2011 9:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2008 5:07 pm
Posts: 1018
Location: Vienne France
Herman wrote:
That is 206, not 216.

Was 216 not one of the cars that you assembled, Lazarus?

As I said in my previous note,I assembled the car .it was not returned to ME with engine problems !


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Frame 54216: truth or not?
PostPosted: Sat Feb 26, 2011 8:40 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 12, 2004 4:26 pm
Posts: 2620
Location: Reeuwijk, The Netherlands
206 and 216 are not the same. 206 was returned in the 30s to Bugatti. I wonder what happend with the frame. Went into a type 55?

_________________
Vive la Marque !!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Frame 54216: truth or not?
PostPosted: Sat Feb 26, 2011 9:43 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2011 8:21 am
Posts: 10
It hasn't been returned to you John, because dad hasn't had engine problems with it, and it would be very hard to complain about the engine when you sold us a cylinder block and numerous bits! Correct me if I'm wrong, but my understanding was that the plate was an original un-numbered plate, stamped with a new Type 54 series number, the number not having been used or allocated by the factory? Of course I may have completely the wrong end of the stick.
Daniel Hicks


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Frame 54216: truth or not?
PostPosted: Sat Feb 26, 2011 10:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2008 5:07 pm
Posts: 1018
Location: Vienne France
dhic001 wrote:
It hasn't been returned to you John, because dad hasn't had engine problems with it, and it would be very hard to complain about the engine when you sold us a cylinder block and numerous bits! Correct me if I'm wrong, but my understanding was that the plate was an original un-numbered plate, stamped with a new Type 54 series number, the number not having been used or allocated by the factory? Of course I may have completely the wrong end of the stick.
Daniel Hicks

The plate is a BOC one or french but recent manufacture,not original.I stamped the number so as not to confuse the issue.This is clearly an impossible number for a T54.Have you driven dads car Daniel? I had five years of genuine pleasure with this car.I had to lift off twice going up Brooklands test hill ! Otherwise I was in danger of going into orbit without a spacesuit.Straight lines were not a problem but bends did require common sense.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Frame 54216: truth or not?
PostPosted: Sun Feb 27, 2011 6:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2008 5:07 pm
Posts: 1018
Location: Vienne France
dhic001 wrote:
It hasn't been returned to you John, because dad hasn't had engine problems with it, and it would be very hard to complain about the engine when you sold us a cylinder block and numerous bits! Correct me if I'm wrong, but my understanding was that the plate was an original un-numbered plate, stamped with a new Type 54 series number, the number not having been used or allocated by the factory? Of course I may have completely the wrong end of the stick.
Daniel Hicks

Dear Daniel,I hope that you and your family are ok after the earthquake.I only heard today.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Frame 54216: truth or not?
PostPosted: Mon Feb 28, 2011 9:45 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2011 8:21 am
Posts: 10
Thanks John,
We are all ok, being almost the other end of the country from the earthquake. All family are ok. From the reports at our Bugatti meeting on the weekend, all Bugatti owners in Christchurch that we have had contact with are ok too. A horrible time for all down there, and will have a huge effect on our small nation.

Re 54216, no i've not driven it, but have spent much time in the passenger seat. Fantastic toy, great fun, if slightly scary, even from the passenger seat! What it would be like with the blown 4.9 in it one can only imagine! A type 50 will be a nice, if slightly more civilised alternative.

Daniel


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Frame 54216: truth or not?
PostPosted: Mon Feb 28, 2011 6:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2008 5:07 pm
Posts: 1018
Location: Vienne France
dhic001 wrote:
Thanks John,
We are all ok, being almost the other end of the country from the earthquake. All family are ok. From the reports at our Bugatti meeting on the weekend, all Bugatti owners in Christchurch that we have had contact with are ok too. A horrible time for all down there, and will have a huge effect on our small nation.

Re 54216, no i've not driven it, but have spent much time in the passenger seat. Fantastic toy, great fun, if slightly scary, even from the passenger seat! What it would be like with the blown 4.9 in it one can only imagine! A type 50 will be a nice, if slightly more civilised alternative.

Daniel

a few T54 drivers died at the wheel....not the most useable Bugatti.Very scary yes,and that was just with the Jaguar 3.8 litre motor,as you say a full blown T54 must be terrifying.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 

All times are UTC + 1 hour


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron

Valid CSS :: Valid XHTML Copyright © 2007 by Bugattibuilder.com :: Disclaimer :: Contact :: Advertising possibilities

Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group