Bugattibuilder.com forum http://www.bugattibuilder.com/forum/ |
|
1935 Aerolithe replica http://www.bugattibuilder.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=1269 |
Page 1 of 8 |
Author: | Uwe [ Fri Jan 30, 2009 11:35 pm ] |
Post subject: | 1935 Aerolithe replica |
........Recreating one of the rarest and most exotic of the Type 57 Bugattis ...... - Pictures of the construction - National Post articles about the process - Movie of first test fire of engine (takes about 30 seconds to download) http://www.guildclassiccars.com/1935_Aerolithe_coupe_1109/Aerolithe.html |
Author: | DJ Dirk [ Sat Jan 31, 2009 11:15 am ] |
Post subject: | |
I haven't read it over yet, but is this the german car on another one? |
Author: | J.J.Horst [ Sat Jan 31, 2009 5:30 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
This is not the German one, click on the links below; there is an article on this new replica in the BugattiRevue, and sev eral reports on it's build in the "News" section of the BugattiPage. |
Author: | Uwe [ Sat Jan 31, 2009 5:49 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
![]() |
Author: | Herman [ Sat Jan 31, 2009 5:54 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Indeed no T57S frame, as it should be. However, I see an ash frame (ok), but also passified screws? |
Author: | Lazarus [ Sat Jan 31, 2009 6:55 pm ] |
Post subject: | T57 Aerolithe |
Is this the car being built in Canada chez the Guild of automotive restorers? If so then it should have the special chassis designed for it which is like GP at rear.I.E tapered in like a boat.With the rear springs on outriggers.The petrol tank is also tapered to fit.The drawings are available from the trust so I dont see the problem in doing it right. |
Author: | Johan Buchner [ Sat Jan 31, 2009 7:52 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
The Aerolithe was built on a standard, albeit shortened T57 chassis. I am aware that a great many people believed, and continue to believe that the Aerolithe was mounted on one of the T57S prototype chassis. Not true, please compare photos of the standard Atlantic with photos of the Aerolithe, in particular the distance between the door-hinges, and even to the most casual observe it should be clear that the Aerolithe and the Atlantic are two very different types of car. Kindly look at that pale blue German attempt to replicate the Aerolithe, every thing is wrong, every perspective out of kilter, proof, if any was needed, that an Aerolithe cannot be replicated on a T57S chassis. I say again, the Aerolithe was built on a standard chassis that had merely been shortened. All we have to do is wait until David Grainger's team finish their Aerolithe project, built on a standard T57 chassis, to see that the argument I first espoused in my article "From Aerolithe to EXK 6" (homepage of this site) is correct, and that the Bugatti Trust, the B.O.C. and everyone tearing their hair out in the ensuing polemic within the pages of Bugantics were, and are, indeed very, very wrong. Go ahead, disagree with me, and make my keyboard's day. Kind Regards Johan "Dirty Harry" Buchner |
Author: | Uwe [ Sat Jan 31, 2009 8:13 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
- |
Author: | Uwe [ Sat Jan 31, 2009 8:23 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
- |
Author: | Gap05 [ Sat Jan 31, 2009 9:36 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Johan Buchner wrote: The Aerolithe was built on a standard, albeit shortened T57 chassis. I am aware that a great many people believed, and continue to believe that the Aerolithe was mounted on one of the T57S prototype chassis. Not true, please compare photos of the standard Atlantic with photos of the Aerolithe, in particular the distance between the door-hinges, and even to the most casual observe it should be clear that the Aerolithe and the Atlantic are two very different types of car....
Kind Regards Johan "Dirty Harry" Buchner I don't how to post a pic, sorry... Please see at user album/Gap 05. I make a pic with Aerolithe and 57374... The cars are very similar... Only the front wings are upper on 57374 and the bonnets of the car have the same height... Just more longer on 57374... Kind Regards and sorry for my English... |
Author: | Johan Buchner [ Sat Jan 31, 2009 9:45 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
<a href="http://www.bugattibuilder.com/photo/albums/userpics/10236/35_10_07_Paris_1_copier.jpg"><img src="http://www.bugattibuilder.com/photo/albums/userpics/10236/normal_35_10_07_Paris_1_copier.jpg" alt="No Title"></a> Interesting. I am not convinced. The two photos does not seemed to be taken from the exact same angle. But interesting all the same. Thanks Johan |
Author: | Herman [ Sat Jan 31, 2009 9:50 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Just for the record: http://www.bugattibuilder.com/articles/bugatti_article_002_From_Aerolithe_to_EXK6.htm |
Author: | Johan Buchner [ Sat Jan 31, 2009 11:48 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Compare at leisure. Johan |
Author: | Herman [ Sun Feb 01, 2009 9:19 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Is the roof of the original flatter / lower? |
Author: | J.J.Horst [ Sun Feb 01, 2009 9:48 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Yes, Peter Borstel the owner requested the roof line to be higher, I believe by about 5cm, he also requested the color (should have been either a silver metallic or a metallic light green/blue. |
Page 1 of 8 | All times are UTC + 1 hour |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |