Bugattibuilder.com forum http://www.bugattibuilder.com/forum/ |
|
OFF http://www.bugattibuilder.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=2279 |
Page 1 of 4 |
Author: | Marek [ Sat Jan 01, 2011 7:46 pm ] |
Post subject: | OFF |
. |
Author: | Herman [ Sat Jan 01, 2011 8:43 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Frame T35-51 |
There are people who have welded frames, but these are considered inferior. So frame longerons should be formed over a mould, to obtain an exact shape. |
Author: | Marek [ Sun Jan 02, 2011 12:10 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Frame T35-51 |
. |
Author: | Marek [ Sun Jan 23, 2011 3:13 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Frame T35-51 |
. |
Author: | Herman [ Sun Jan 23, 2011 3:18 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Frame T35-51 |
Yes, that is basicly what it looks like. Or use a (huge) press. |
Author: | davids [ Sun Jan 23, 2011 8:19 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Frame T35-51 |
That is a foto from the argentine workshops beating a chassis frame over a strong former. |
Author: | Udolahr [ Mon Jan 24, 2011 2:09 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Frame T35-51 |
I did look at some argentina frames , this frames are not made this way . |
Author: | davids [ Mon Jan 24, 2011 8:51 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Frame T35-51 |
It says PS.A as foto reference lower left...and is on their web site.... David |
Author: | Marek [ Mon Jan 24, 2011 6:49 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Frame T35-51 |
. |
Author: | Greg Morgan [ Mon Jan 24, 2011 7:25 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Frame T35-51 |
Someone who is very much in the know told me that when Hugh Conway put this tracing in his Grand Prix Bugatti book, he deliberatley made some of the radius different over the rear axle, to stop making it easy to copy.... All the info you need is shown at the front end, however. Greg |
Author: | HAL [ Mon Jan 24, 2011 7:40 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Frame T35-51 |
Greg Morgan wrote: Someone who is very much in the know told me that when Hugh Conway put this tracing in his Grand Prix Bugatti book, he deliberatley made some of the radius different over the rear axle, to stop making it easy to copy.... All the info you need is shown at the front end, however. Greg Well Greg, this may be true or not. I am afraid we can“t ask HGC anymore. Fact is however, that many Molsheim factory drawings contain errors and/or have never been updated with the modifications that have evolved in the production. He who thinks that he only needs a copy of a works drawing to replicate a spare part is doomed. One always needs the original (!) or in the best case several originals of the component to verify. Knowing this, we can understand why many people in the past have tried to reproduce parts but failed. |
Author: | nicefloor [ Mon Jan 24, 2011 7:53 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Frame T35-51 |
Marek - though "inferior" I have successfully fabricated a frame from that drawing....even solved the conflicting radius issue in the back. E-mail me and I can tell you what I know about it..... Attachment: 101_0939-w640-h480.jpg [ 359.58 KiB | Viewed 49446 times ] |
Author: | Udolahr [ Mon Jan 24, 2011 9:46 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Frame T35-51 |
I have the drawing with CAD ( dxf , dwg), made from the original Bugatti factory drawing |
Author: | Marek [ Mon Jan 24, 2011 11:52 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Frame T35-51 |
. |
Author: | Udolahr [ Tue Jan 25, 2011 11:18 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Frame T35-51 |
some of the fotos are not real , propaganda . Hugh Conway made deliberatley some of the radius different over the rear axle, to stop making it easy to copy ! This is just a story . He did not use CAD , and was not able to do it better . Today with CAD , I make the radiuses with plus-minus 0,001mm . |
Page 1 of 4 | All times are UTC + 1 hour |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |