Bugattibuilder.com forum :: View topic

I'm not a Saint Inquisition. I consider it as a continuation of the history. In hostory of art are known such a situations were pieces of art were resumed from oryginal models or matrix. The date of resume define the origin those new pieces of art. One of aspects was to show this art to wider publicity. It means it was shown it many places in the world. I case of sculpture and graphic artist defined himself the numbers of planned pieces. But not always the edition was used by the artist. So I think that the number "4" was only the momentary amount. In this case the resume depends only on the decision. So I think that the history is not finished yet, Dear John.
I hope that I do not mixed something.
All the best
Marek Jerzy

Author:	37quest [ Thu Jul 19, 2012 1:56 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: T73C Motor under test
John that looks lovely I do find that engine very visually appealing, in fact Bugatti rarely did ugly. impressive project.

Author:	Lazarus [ Thu Jul 19, 2012 2:39 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: T73C Motor under test
37quest wrote: John that looks lovely I do find that engine very visually appealing, in fact Bugatti rarely did ugly. impressive project. Yes it is nice.Sedgewick once wrote of the facel vega facellia engine "neat nightmare" and of the facel 6 Healey motor " unsightly cure" Now that the obvious design/manufacturing problems are sorted the engines work well.Tom Darks car bears witness to that.

Author:	Herman [ Thu Jul 19, 2012 5:14 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: T73C Motor under test
Congratulations! Next step: laptimes!

Author:	davids [ Thu Jul 19, 2012 5:22 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: T73C Motor under test
it is indeed a work of art.. a shame it is hidden within the bodywork...

Author:	Marek [ Thu Jul 19, 2012 8:48 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: T73C Motor under test
Hello John, for sure very nice view and also thanks. Do you know what number and designation you will give? Will we hear the virginal sound of your engine? Marek Jerzy

Bugattibuilder.com forum http://www.bugattibuilder.com/forum/

T73C Motor under test http://www.bugattibuilder.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=4020	Page 1 of 1

Author:	Lazarus [ Fri Jul 20, 2012 7:53 am ]
Post subject:	Re: T73C Motor under test
Marek wrote: Hello John, for sure very nice view and also thanks. Do you know what number and designation you will give? Will we hear the virginal sound of your engine? Marek Jerzy Number and designation I will give ? Bugatti called it a Type73C engine what is wrong with that ? It replaces the original Type 73C engine for my car [which i still have ] which was totally frost damaged in 1947.My original is number 4.I have numbered this engine also 4.The original block will always stay with the car.Sadly I do not have the technology to make videos.[only engines]

Author:	Marek [ Fri Jul 20, 2012 12:18 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: T73C Motor under test
I'm not a Saint Inquisition. I consider it as a continuation of the history. In hostory of art are known such a situations were pieces of art were resumed from oryginal models or matrix. The date of resume define the origin those new pieces of art. One of aspects was to show this art to wider publicity. It means it was shown it many places in the world. I case of sculpture and graphic artist defined himself the numbers of planned pieces. But not always the edition was used by the artist. So I think that the number "4" was only the momentary amount. In this case the resume depends only on the decision. So I think that the history is not finished yet, Dear John. I hope that I do not mixed something. All the best Marek Jerzy

Author:	Lazarus [ Fri Jul 20, 2012 5:41 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: T73C Motor under test
Marek wrote: I'm not a Saint Inquisition. I consider it as a continuation of the history. In hostory of art are known such a situations were pieces of art were resumed from oryginal models or matrix. The date of resume define the origin those new pieces of art. One of aspects was to show this art to wider publicity. It means it was shown it many places in the world. I case of sculpture and graphic artist defined himself the numbers of planned pieces. But not always the edition was used by the artist. So I think that the number "4" was only the momentary amount. In this case the resume depends only on the decision. So I think that the history is not finished yet, Dear John. I hope that I do not mixed something. All the best Marek Jerzy Thank you Marek.I think that I understand !!!

Page 1 of 1	All times are UTC + 1 hour
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/