It is currently Sat Aug 02, 2025 3:00 pm

All times are UTC + 1 hour




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 104 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Bugatti ???
PostPosted: Fri Jun 17, 2011 10:18 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2011 7:57 am
Posts: 45
Udolahr wrote:
England is the only country in the EU with a replica car industry , so they must be upset .


"L'homme qui ressuscite les Bugatti"

I understand there is quite an active cell of Bugatti manufacturers in France. According to the proprietor's interview in "La rage de l'automobile" (2009) : "Depuis 89, les lieux ont vu naitre 250 moteurs au bas mot."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bugatti ???
PostPosted: Fri Jun 17, 2011 1:50 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Aug 16, 2009 3:17 am
Posts: 1041
Location: Baden-Baden Germany
in this case , we have one more country with a reason to be upset .


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bugatti ???
PostPosted: Fri Jun 17, 2011 2:01 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 12, 2004 4:26 pm
Posts: 2620
Location: Reeuwijk, The Netherlands
Don't forget our friend in Hungary. I guess replica building is everywhere. But the Brits seem to have invented avoiding import taxes. I see it everywhere.

_________________
Vive la Marque !!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bugatti ???
PostPosted: Fri Jun 17, 2011 4:27 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2011 7:57 am
Posts: 45
Who is building "Bugattis" in Hungary please ?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bugatti ???
PostPosted: Fri Jun 17, 2011 4:31 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 12, 2004 4:26 pm
Posts: 2620
Location: Reeuwijk, The Netherlands
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=2279

_________________
Vive la Marque !!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bugatti ???
PostPosted: Fri Jun 17, 2011 8:53 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 5:47 pm
Posts: 131
Hallo!
Is it a question about me? No, I'm not an Hungarian. Currently I'm playing in sandpit. Saying about what is false and what is true, this way od forming is named "forming on false". It is not depend on what you do. I mean you work honestly or falsify.
Digression about replicas: Hellenistic art also saved because of Roman copies. It is sad but it is true.
Herman, you asked for more technology.
Best Regards
Marek


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bugatti ???
PostPosted: Sat Jun 18, 2011 7:45 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 4:21 pm
Posts: 434
Location: Bergen NH (NL)
Desiderata wrote:
I am told by one of their friends that in England both Hamish Moffat and Dan Margulies were investigated and heavily fined by the Inland Revenue Service (or whatever it's called) for understating the value of one or more Bugatti imported from the USA several years after the event.

This is something different, it was - and still is - a common "game". One has to pay import duty (10 %) and VAT on the so-called "border-crossing value", meaning the purchase price plus freight and costs. A false contract with lower price is issued between seller and buyer and presented to the customs office.

The standard tariff number for passenger vehicles - new or used - is 8703, as written above 10 % import duty is applicable. Plus the import sales tax which is the substitute for the VAT and therefore equivalent to it. Certain historic cars (not all, there are some rules to fulfill, which in practice are subject to the individual interpretation of the acting customs officer, but REAL Bugattis are undisputable) can be imported under tariff number 9705 (WORKS OF ART, COLLECTORS' PIECES AND ANTIQUES) at a reduced customs tariff rate of 5 %. As these items are also free of VAT when sold within the EU the import sales tax is not applicable. Of course this duty can also additionally illegally reduced by false item values.

The import procedure is part of the chain to get the car road registered, as the customs document is required by the registration office. So if you import a "Pur Sang" as new car, road registration will not be possible. An option would be to declare it as second hand car, built 1927/28/29, with the same duties and taxes as new ones, but probably a good trained customs officer will change the declaration from 8703 to 9705.

The essence of this is clear - if you import a Pur Sang Bugatti (from outside the EU, e.g. from Argentina) you have to do this as historic car in order to get it road registered, and by doing so you are illegally evade taxes!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bugatti ???
PostPosted: Sun Jun 19, 2011 6:37 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Aug 16, 2009 3:17 am
Posts: 1041
Location: Baden-Baden Germany
if you import a new argentina car to germany , but in the custom papers it is from 1928 , you save about 30 000€ So the custom people are not realy care about original , but about 30 000€ .


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bugatti ???
PostPosted: Mon Jun 20, 2011 9:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 2:39 pm
Posts: 84
Udolahr wrote:
if you import a new argentina car to germany , but in the custom papers it is from 1928 , you save about 30 000€ So the custom people are not realy care about original , but about 30 000€ .



Would the Germans import such a car to evade taxes? I can't imagine that. Imagine throwing a pinch of this Bugatti, a story, an old document, or a 50.000 Euro chassis plate you bought at Retromobile that belongs to an existing car - mix it all up and Puff - you've a 1928 car.... suddenly you have an original, part original, suspected to be original, or hopefully original. If you can't find Bugatti DNA at a jumble, use a body part of a former owner or passenger or victim, that works also - well it did for a while on one car ......

On other notes, 45 people were arrested , and a load of cars seized from a shop making replica Fiats, Siatas,etc, in north Italy 2 weeks ago. Police said the copies were poor quality. They would have been better off doing better quality replicas .


Attachments:
File comment: foot
crashed_atlantic.jpg
crashed_atlantic.jpg [ 100.51 KiB | Viewed 9698 times ]
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bugatti ???
PostPosted: Mon Jun 20, 2011 5:48 pm 
Offline
Valued contributor

Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 10:39 am
Posts: 1029
Location: Port Elizabeth; South Africa
I'm going to make a statement and you only need respond if you disagree strongly :

1) This is how chassis 57473 ended ; mangled and torn apart by the train.

2) Some components may very well have been retrieved from a scrap-yard some years later but the chassis frame is not among them.

3) It is difficult to imagine a calamity befalling a car which would destroy everything except the chassis frame, therefore if only the chassis frame survive then usually the chassis frame is all that survived the calamity. Or it was an unused frame, ex-factory, but I digress.

4) For a Bugatti to lay claim to a history at the very least the frame must have left through the gates of Molsheim, preferably before 1940.

5) Some of the world's smartest collectors, dealers and restoration specialists believed they could restore 57473 back to rude good health, but alas they succeeded only in building a very beautiful car that looks just like a real Bugatti. Fail. Big fail. Huge. Looks like a fool, pants on the ground.

Kind Regards
Johan Buchner


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bugatti ???
PostPosted: Mon Jun 20, 2011 6:01 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 1:12 pm
Posts: 2285
Johan Buchner wrote:
1) This is how chassis 57473 ended ; mangled and torn apart by the train.

2) Some components may very well have been retrieved from a scrap-yard some years later but the chassis frame is not among them.

3) It is difficult to imagine a calamity befalling a car which would destroy everything except the chassis frame, therefore if only the chassis frame survive then usually the chassis frame is all that survived the calamity. Or it was an unused frame, ex-factory, but I digress.

4) For a Bugatti to lay claim to a history at the very least the frame must have left through the gates of Molsheim, preferably before 1940.

6) Some of the world's smartest collectors, dealers and restoration specialists believed they could restore 57473 back to rude good health, but alas they succeeded only in building a very beautiful car that looks just like a real Bugatti. Fail. Big fail. Huge. Looks like a fool, pants on the ground.


Hi Johan,
you forgot 5), otherwise completely correctly :!:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bugatti ???
PostPosted: Mon Jun 20, 2011 6:16 pm 
Offline
Valued contributor

Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 10:39 am
Posts: 1029
Location: Port Elizabeth; South Africa
I got you Uwe, I edited my post! Which makes me the saddest man ever.

I remain Proudly
Johan


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bugatti ???
PostPosted: Mon Jun 20, 2011 6:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2008 5:07 pm
Posts: 1018
Location: Vienne France
Johan Buchner wrote:
I got you Uwe, I edited my post! Which makes me the saddest man ever.

I remain Proudly
Johan

edit again,make 6 into 5 Voila.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bugatti ???
PostPosted: Tue Jun 21, 2011 6:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 2:39 pm
Posts: 84
Johan Buchner wrote:
I'm going to make a statement and you only need respond if you disagree strongly :

2) Some components may very well have been retrieved from a scrap-yard some years later but the chassis frame is not among them.

3) It is difficult to imagine a calamity befalling a car which would destroy everything except the chassis frame, therefore if only the chassis frame survive then usually the chassis frame is all that survived the calamity. Or it was an unused frame, ex-factory, but I digress.

4) For a Bugatti to lay claim to a history at the very least the frame must have left through the gates of Molsheim, preferably before 1940.

5) Some of the world's smartest collectors, dealers and restoration specialists believed .........
Johan Buchner


2) Some pieces did leave the junk yard and have been put on the replica , twice.
3) The chassis frame and all steel parts to this wreck were sorted into piles in two parts of the junk yard. The aluminum was in the one pile, separated in the junk yard. As the steel pile was crushed and hauled off to be melted down, the aluminium pile remained because there was not enough to combine for the melt. In the time between the piles existing and one disappearing, some of the mechanical parts ''may have'' walked away over time. That is a fact - some people were there during the time.
4) No piece, not a single molecule of the chassis of the wreck survived.
5) There was never a belief from anyone who touched this replica that any of it was a restoration of the actual car. All those involved were all well paid and all have an interest in creating a fantastic story of the reincarnation of this long lost car.

There is no mystery, no unanswered questions. There has just been a reconstitution of the facts, and omitting a degree of truth , all of which those involved has been paid for ''tuning'' the story. Someday a novice will see it, have the money, have to have it, and there is enough documentation to steer the replica into a high value sale without any further questions. It happens all the time.


Attachments:
alt-2.jpg
alt-2.jpg [ 555.82 KiB | Viewed 9608 times ]
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 104 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7

All times are UTC + 1 hour


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

Valid CSS :: Valid XHTML Copyright © 2007 by Bugattibuilder.com :: Disclaimer :: Contact :: Advertising possibilities

Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group